Whether the assets listed at paragraph 4 constitute 'unexplained assets' under Sections 2 and 55 of the Anti-Corruption & Economic Crimes Act Ĥ. Whether the properties listed at paragraph 4 hereunder ought to be preserved pending the determination of the suit ģ. Whether the Defendants are in possession of unexplained assets itemised hereunder at paragraph 4 Ģ. In the Originating Summons lodged under the provisions of section 55 of ACECA and Order XXXVI of the Civil Procedure Rules, the plaintiff seeks determination of the following issues as against the defendants:ġ. Ultimately, however, the pending suits and applications were disposed of, and the matter is now ripe for determination.Ģ. A series of suits, petitions and applications have derailed the hearing of the substantive issues raised in the application. In the application brought under the provisions of the Anti-corruption and Economic Crimes Act (ACECA), the plaintiff, then the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (KACC), the predecessor of the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), sought various orders against the defendants. It was initiated by way of an Originating Summons dated 18 th September 2008. This matter has had a rather long sojourn in our courts. RICKAIR TRAVEL AGENCIES LIMITED.7 TH DEFENDANTġ. ODEAR NASEWA HOLDINGS LIMITED.6 TH DEFENDANT ROSALINE WANJIRA ABACHI.2 ND DEFENDANTīENJAMIN MAKOKHA ABACHI.3 RD DEFENDANT ANTI-CORRUPTION AND ECONOMIC CRIMES DIVISIONĮTHICS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION.PLAINTIFF
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |